<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Passionately opinionated &#187; Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/category/windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk</link>
	<description>a blog by Ben Fallaize</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/10/windows-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/10/windows-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Fallaize</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants and Rambles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you seen the new adverts for Windows 7 on the TV?  I&#8217;m a PC, and Windows 7 was my idea&#8230; Microsoft are obviously trying to push the fact that they have listened to their painstaked users and are now responding.  Having not seen 7 in the flesh yet, I can&#8217;t really comment on it, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen the new adverts for Windows 7 on the TV?  I&#8217;m a PC, and Windows 7 was my idea&#8230;</p>
<p>Microsoft are obviously trying to push the fact that they have listened to their painstaked users and are now responding.  Having not seen 7 in the flesh yet, I can&#8217;t really comment on it, however I can see a Microsoft ad in a couple of years, once 7 has flopped just like vista:</p>
<p><em>Windows 7.  It&#8217;s not our fault, it was all your idea&#8230;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/10/windows-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Explorer 8</title>
		<link>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/10/microsofts-internet-explorer-8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/10/microsofts-internet-explorer-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 07:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Fallaize</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants and Rambles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The source of most of my pain this week.  Web standards, the only standard being set by this browser is "what not to do in the world of web browsers".  Websites that worked fine before IE8?  <a href="http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/10/microsofts-internet-explorer-8/">Enter here...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite a while ago, IE8 was released to the general public.  It was billed to be the best browser for web developers, as it now had proper web standards built in like every other browser in the world.  It also had this great feature allowing you to render the page in IE7 mode&#8230;</p>
<p>Microsoft, what the hell are you playing at?</p>
<p>This week, I had not one, but two phone calls from customers announcing to me that their site had stopped working.  In both cases, it was the menu at fault.  One site has a fairly hefty javascript based menu, and the other drop-down submenus.  So, off I go, testing the sites in all browsers available to me, FF, IE6, 7, Safari, Mac FF, Mac Safari, and then came IE8.</p>
<p>Now we&#8217;re not talking a slight rendering issue here, or an IE-hackable few pixels out of place, IE8 had invented a Javascript error.  Every other browser in the world was fine, but IE8 had a problem with it.  So this is bad enough, but in IE8 there is a button called Compatibility mode.</p>
<p>From the MS site: <em>Internet Explorer 8 is a new release and some websites may not yet be ready for the new browser. Click the </em><strong><em>Compatibility View</em></strong><em> toolbar button to display the website as viewed in Internet Explorer 7, which will correct display problems like misaligned text, images, or text boxes.</em></p>
<p>Sure enough, this actually fixes the problem.  What the hell?  Microsoft have released a browser that in default form, doesn&#8217;t work very well, but if you want it  to work properly, you can just click a button.  I&#8217;m sat here now fuming about this.  If I put out a website where nothing worked, unless you click a small button first, without any prompting, I&#8217;d be fired for shoddy workmanship.  Yet the biggest software house in the world seems to think it&#8217;s ok?</p>
<p>Now I need to spend considerable amounts of time fixing websites to work in a minority browser, when this goes against all the normal rules just because of who it is.  Well F*** you Microsoft, I&#8217;m never going back to a PC if you keep this attitude up.  Leave your browser to die, and let the experts who work for free sort out the world&#8217;s internet browsing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/10/microsofts-internet-explorer-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A fantastic mac/windows article</title>
		<link>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/09/the-best-macwindows-article-ive-ever-read/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/09/the-best-macwindows-article-ive-ever-read/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Fallaize</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants and Rambles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article by Charlie Brooker, of the Guardian.  This bloke's sense of humour appeals to me!

<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/sep/28/charlie-brooker-microsoft-mac-windows" target="_blank">Click here to read</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An article by Charlie Brooker, of the Guardian.  This bloke&#8217;s sense of humour appeals to me!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/sep/28/charlie-brooker-microsoft-mac-windows" target="_blank">Click here to read</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/09/the-best-macwindows-article-ive-ever-read/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Snow Leopard</title>
		<link>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/08/snow-leopard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/08/snow-leopard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 17:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Fallaize</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally, the refinement the Mac world has been waiting for&#8230; First impressions are, it is faster, but it&#8217;s not the huge gap I was expecting.  Apple have re-written the entire operating system to run natively in 64 bit.  Good news since Apple have been pushing 64bit Core 2 Duo processors out for a few years [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, the refinement the Mac world has been waiting for&#8230;</p>
<p>First impressions are, it is faster, but it&#8217;s not the huge gap I was expecting.  Apple have re-written the entire operating system to run natively in 64 bit.  Good news since Apple have been pushing 64bit Core 2 Duo processors out for a few years now.</p>
<p>I was teetering on the edge of swapping back to a dedicated Windows machine.  Those who read my last post would have seen me surprised to see how well Vista runs through Bootcamp.  Well, I decided to run a little test.</p>
<p>Photoshop CS3, 141 JPG images and an automated action with the following commands:</p>
<ol>
<li>Auto levels</li>
<li>Auto colour</li>
<li>Resize to 50%</li>
<li>Save for Web</li>
<li>Close</li>
</ol>
<p>So, Snow Leopard was first, and completed the test in 6:55.  Windows was booted up, and I opened the images.  I wish I had timed the opening of the 141 images, as Windows was considerably slower.  Once it finally opened, the action was run.  Windows completed in 7:45.</p>
<p>Both tests were run from a folder on the desktop, both from the same hard drive.</p>
<p>I think if the RAM was upgraded, the Mac would have steamed ahead thanks to it&#8217;s 64bit-ness.</p>
<p>So, for now, I&#8217;m back on the Mac side of the fence&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/08/snow-leopard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows vs OSX</title>
		<link>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/06/windows-vs-osx/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/06/windows-vs-osx/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Fallaize</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bootcamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monkey island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m posting this from the usual place, in front of my stunning iMac.  However, there is one major difference.  Behind this website is firefox, nothing unusual there, but behind that is a Windows desktop, and not just any version of Windows, it&#8217;s Vista. Previous readers will have read my opinion of Vista and Microsoft in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m posting this from the usual place, in front of my stunning iMac.  However, there is one major difference.  Behind this website is firefox, nothing unusual there, but behind that is a Windows desktop, and not just any version of Windows, it&#8217;s Vista.</p>
<p>Previous readers will have read my opinion of Vista and Microsoft in general since I became a Mac user.</p>
<p>So, what happened?  Well, a friend sent me a link detailing the upcoming release of a new series of Monkey Island games.  To your average nerd, this is the best news since, well, the last Monkey Island game!  This presents a problem to the Mac user.  A productive, stable machine it is, but a games platform it isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>So, Bootcamp was installed, and then Vista was dusted down and installed.  I am slightly concerned to say, that Vista appears to run quicker and more efficiently that Leopard.  I know that I need to install Anti-Virus etc, but I was expecting to install a great big turd of an operating system, as I remember it on my laptop, but it just doesn&#8217;t seem to be.  Maybe the service packs and general updates have improved it, but I am actually enjoying using it again.  Plus, I much prefer Photoshop and Dreamweaver on the PC.  They just seem to work nicer, however I&#8217;ve been using video capture recently, and also iDVD, and these run nicer on the mac than the PC&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/06/windows-vs-osx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
