<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Passionately opinionated &#187; featured</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/tag/featured/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk</link>
	<description>a blog by Ben Fallaize</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The HP virus strikes again</title>
		<link>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/12/the-hp-virus-strikes-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/12/the-hp-virus-strikes-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Fallaize</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants and Rambles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/?p=130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I couldn't help feel guilty the other day.  A colleague casually mentioned to me that he had a HP laptop.  Straight away, I asked him how old it was.  "12 months" was the reply.  I jokingly told him that he had 2 months left on it before it committed firey suicide...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t help feel guilty the other day.  A colleague casually mentioned to me that he had a HP laptop.  Straight away, I asked him how old it was.  &#8221;12 months&#8221; was the reply.  I jokingly told him that he had 2 months left on it before it committed firey suicide&#8230;</p>
<p>Yesterday, he came in and told me that it had indeed died.  In actual fact, it died in exactly the same way as my one did.  The wireless adapter suddenly disappeared and the laptop doesn&#8217;t seem to acknowledge that it even exists.  I gave him the link for the free repair that HP performed for me.  Still waiting to see if the laptop is in fact one of the models listed on the HP site, but I&#8217;d place a fair amount of money on it.</p>
<p>So, why call it a virus?  It&#8217;s blatantly a case of poorly constructed hardware!  Well unfortunately, I bought the 2 machines based on recommendation.  Similarly, my colleague recommended the laptop to all his friends.  So, there we have it, the curse of failing hardware, spread by the good intentions of happy customers early on in life, only to be become a whole web of disappointment, in say, 14 months&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/12/the-hp-virus-strikes-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why mess with convention?</title>
		<link>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/11/why-mess-with-convention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/11/why-mess-with-convention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Fallaize</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants and Rambles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/?p=101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A rant of a different kind tonight...

Did you know, the first computer mouse was invented in 1964?  Sure, it wasn't anything like what we use today, but the basic concept was there.  For some time now, mice have had 1 or 2 buttons.  Later on came the scroll wheel.  Now, with optical technology, wireless, and the addition of a few more buttons, the mouse is a technical marvel compared to the old ball mice of the 90's.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A rant of a different kind tonight&#8230;</p>
<p>Did you know, the first computer mouse was invented in 1964?  Sure, it wasn&#8217;t anything like what we use today, but the basic concept was there.  For some time now, mice have had 1 or 2 buttons.  Later on came the scroll wheel.  Now, with optical technology, wireless, and the addition of a few more buttons, the mouse is a technical marvel compared to the old ball mice of the 90&#8242;s.</p>
<p>Where is this going you might ask?</p>
<p>I used a classic mac in secondary school.  One of the all-in-ones with the square mouse with one button.  This worked fine.  Why then, have Apple felt the need to mess with the design of the mouse since then?  The hockey puck, that rotates in your hand, meaning you get tangled up with the cable, and can&#8217;t press the button.  Then there was the mouse where the entire shell pressed down.  More recently came the &#8220;Mighty mouse&#8221;.  Every single one of these had a stupid wheel, which while nice to use, eventually stopped working.  It also had a one piece shell, but had two clickable regions.  I always had trouble with the right mouse button clicking when I didn&#8217;t want it to.  Now, the Magic mouse has arrived.  No wheel on this one, but it has multi touch capabilities.  You have to sit through a tutorial on how to use the most basic peripheral that&#8217;s been around since the 80&#8242;s&#8230;</p>
<p>A colleague recently compared me buying a Logitech mouse for my mac to &#8220;putting a K&amp;N filter on a Ferrari&#8221;.  I replied with, &#8220;a Ferrari wouldn&#8217;t need a K&amp;N because the standard filter works perfectly well&#8221;.  Said colleague has since purchased a Logitech mouse for his MacBook Pro&#8230;</p>
<p>Unfortunately Apple seems to have a style over function attitude in this respect.  A mouse has 2 buttons and a scrolly wheel.  Apple, pay Logitech to make you a nice white mouse, your users will thank you for it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/11/why-mess-with-convention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/10/windows-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/10/windows-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Fallaize</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants and Rambles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you seen the new adverts for Windows 7 on the TV?  I&#8217;m a PC, and Windows 7 was my idea&#8230; Microsoft are obviously trying to push the fact that they have listened to their painstaked users and are now responding.  Having not seen 7 in the flesh yet, I can&#8217;t really comment on it, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen the new adverts for Windows 7 on the TV?  I&#8217;m a PC, and Windows 7 was my idea&#8230;</p>
<p>Microsoft are obviously trying to push the fact that they have listened to their painstaked users and are now responding.  Having not seen 7 in the flesh yet, I can&#8217;t really comment on it, however I can see a Microsoft ad in a couple of years, once 7 has flopped just like vista:</p>
<p><em>Windows 7.  It&#8217;s not our fault, it was all your idea&#8230;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/10/windows-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Explorer 8</title>
		<link>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/10/microsofts-internet-explorer-8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/10/microsofts-internet-explorer-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 07:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Fallaize</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants and Rambles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The source of most of my pain this week.  Web standards, the only standard being set by this browser is "what not to do in the world of web browsers".  Websites that worked fine before IE8?  <a href="http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/10/microsofts-internet-explorer-8/">Enter here...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite a while ago, IE8 was released to the general public.  It was billed to be the best browser for web developers, as it now had proper web standards built in like every other browser in the world.  It also had this great feature allowing you to render the page in IE7 mode&#8230;</p>
<p>Microsoft, what the hell are you playing at?</p>
<p>This week, I had not one, but two phone calls from customers announcing to me that their site had stopped working.  In both cases, it was the menu at fault.  One site has a fairly hefty javascript based menu, and the other drop-down submenus.  So, off I go, testing the sites in all browsers available to me, FF, IE6, 7, Safari, Mac FF, Mac Safari, and then came IE8.</p>
<p>Now we&#8217;re not talking a slight rendering issue here, or an IE-hackable few pixels out of place, IE8 had invented a Javascript error.  Every other browser in the world was fine, but IE8 had a problem with it.  So this is bad enough, but in IE8 there is a button called Compatibility mode.</p>
<p>From the MS site: <em>Internet Explorer 8 is a new release and some websites may not yet be ready for the new browser. Click the </em><strong><em>Compatibility View</em></strong><em> toolbar button to display the website as viewed in Internet Explorer 7, which will correct display problems like misaligned text, images, or text boxes.</em></p>
<p>Sure enough, this actually fixes the problem.  What the hell?  Microsoft have released a browser that in default form, doesn&#8217;t work very well, but if you want it  to work properly, you can just click a button.  I&#8217;m sat here now fuming about this.  If I put out a website where nothing worked, unless you click a small button first, without any prompting, I&#8217;d be fired for shoddy workmanship.  Yet the biggest software house in the world seems to think it&#8217;s ok?</p>
<p>Now I need to spend considerable amounts of time fixing websites to work in a minority browser, when this goes against all the normal rules just because of who it is.  Well F*** you Microsoft, I&#8217;m never going back to a PC if you keep this attitude up.  Leave your browser to die, and let the experts who work for free sort out the world&#8217;s internet browsing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/10/microsofts-internet-explorer-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Snow Leopard</title>
		<link>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/08/snow-leopard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/08/snow-leopard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 17:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Fallaize</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally, the refinement the Mac world has been waiting for&#8230; First impressions are, it is faster, but it&#8217;s not the huge gap I was expecting.  Apple have re-written the entire operating system to run natively in 64 bit.  Good news since Apple have been pushing 64bit Core 2 Duo processors out for a few years [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, the refinement the Mac world has been waiting for&#8230;</p>
<p>First impressions are, it is faster, but it&#8217;s not the huge gap I was expecting.  Apple have re-written the entire operating system to run natively in 64 bit.  Good news since Apple have been pushing 64bit Core 2 Duo processors out for a few years now.</p>
<p>I was teetering on the edge of swapping back to a dedicated Windows machine.  Those who read my last post would have seen me surprised to see how well Vista runs through Bootcamp.  Well, I decided to run a little test.</p>
<p>Photoshop CS3, 141 JPG images and an automated action with the following commands:</p>
<ol>
<li>Auto levels</li>
<li>Auto colour</li>
<li>Resize to 50%</li>
<li>Save for Web</li>
<li>Close</li>
</ol>
<p>So, Snow Leopard was first, and completed the test in 6:55.  Windows was booted up, and I opened the images.  I wish I had timed the opening of the 141 images, as Windows was considerably slower.  Once it finally opened, the action was run.  Windows completed in 7:45.</p>
<p>Both tests were run from a folder on the desktop, both from the same hard drive.</p>
<p>I think if the RAM was upgraded, the Mac would have steamed ahead thanks to it&#8217;s 64bit-ness.</p>
<p>So, for now, I&#8217;m back on the Mac side of the fence&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benfallaize.co.uk/2009/08/snow-leopard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
